Difference between revisions of "Photo book print shops"

From Aram's Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Quality)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:Photography]]
 +
 
== Cheap ==
 
== Cheap ==
  
Line 5: Line 7:
 
== Quality ==
 
== Quality ==
  
* [https://www.booksmartstudio.com Booksmart Studio], high end printer, both inkjet and digital press.
+
* [https://www.booksmartstudio.com Booksmart Studio], high end printer, both inkjet and digital press. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
* [https://www.pikto.com Pikto], from Canada, digital press printing and chromogenic printing.
+
* [https://www.pikto.com Pikto], from Canada, digital press printing and chromogenic printing. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
* [https://www.whcc.com White House Custom Colour], from California, digital press printing and chromogenic printing.
+
* [https://www.whcc.com White House Custom Colour], from California, digital press printing and chromogenic printing. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
 +
* [http://www.fujifilm-fotoservicepro.eu/en/ FUJIFILM Fotoservice pro], from Europe, crazy cheap, require annoying software. Photo process, not digital press.
 +
* [https://www.digitalprolab.com/index.html Digital Pro Lab], from Texas, have press profiles, but don't use press printing for albums. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
 +
* [https://simplycolorlab.com Simply Color Lab], photo printing. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
 +
 
 +
== Best quality ==
 +
 
 +
* [https://www.hemlock.com Hemlock], they print LensWork.
  
 
== Questionable ==
 
== Questionable ==
Line 14: Line 23:
 
* [https://www.prodpi.com ProDPI], they seem to know what they are doing, but I found their ICC profiles only for their chromogenic prints. Also, I heard a rumor that they were bought by WHCC.
 
* [https://www.prodpi.com ProDPI], they seem to know what they are doing, but I found their ICC profiles only for their chromogenic prints. Also, I heard a rumor that they were bought by WHCC.
 
* [https://www.mpixpro.com MpixPro], they claim to offer ICC profiles only for their photo processes, not press.
 
* [https://www.mpixpro.com MpixPro], they claim to offer ICC profiles only for their photo processes, not press.
 +
* [https://paperchasepress.com Paper Chase Press], they seem to know what they are doing, but they want a GRACoL2006_Coated1v2 color profile.
 +
 +
== Not reviewed ==
 +
 +
* [https://www.rit.edu/fa/hub/printing-services RIT], mentioned by Bill Atkinson.

Latest revision as of 10:29, 22 February 2019


Cheap

  • Blurb, no soft-proofing, spotty quality control and inconsistent.

Quality

  • Booksmart Studio, high end printer, both inkjet and digital press. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
  • Pikto, from Canada, digital press printing and chromogenic printing. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
  • White House Custom Colour, from California, digital press printing and chromogenic printing. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
  • FUJIFILM Fotoservice pro, from Europe, crazy cheap, require annoying software. Photo process, not digital press.
  • Digital Pro Lab, from Texas, have press profiles, but don't use press printing for albums. Does NOT accept output-ready files.
  • Simply Color Lab, photo printing. Does NOT accept output-ready files.

Best quality

Questionable

  • AdoramaPix, link to profiles, unclear whether they do this right or not. Some FAQ entry claims they don't offer ICC profiles! They are using a chromogenic process for books, not digital press.
  • ProDPI, they seem to know what they are doing, but I found their ICC profiles only for their chromogenic prints. Also, I heard a rumor that they were bought by WHCC.
  • MpixPro, they claim to offer ICC profiles only for their photo processes, not press.
  • Paper Chase Press, they seem to know what they are doing, but they want a GRACoL2006_Coated1v2 color profile.

Not reviewed

  • RIT, mentioned by Bill Atkinson.