687
edits
Changes
→References
|300 W
|4850 lm
|-
|Powerlight
|Halogen
|200 W
|3980 lm
|-
|Osram
== Color rendering ==
The the most common standard is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_rendering_index CRI]. Unfortunately, CRI is pretty useless, but consumer manufacturers frequently only specify CRI. You want something with CRI over 95. An important color not taken into account by CRI is [https://www.waveformlighting.com/tech/what-is-cri-r9-and-why-is-it-important/ R9]. You want something with R9 over 90.
A much better standard is [https://tech.ebu.ch/tlci-2012 TCLITLCI]. You want something with TCLI TLCI over 90.
=== TCLI results ===
=== Quality ===
* [https://www.waveformlighting.com Waveform lighting]
* [https://www.yujiintl.com Yuji International]
* [https://www.soraa.com Soraa]
* [http://solux.net Solux] (Nobel price winner who invented blue LEDs works here)
=== High power ===
!CRI
!R9
!TCLITLCI
!Notes
|-
|91/95
|
|FilmGrade series has 95 TLCI
|-
|Yuji
|95+
|97
|recommended by gaffers
|-
|Soraa
|
|93
|low power600 lm only|-|Ikea|Trådfri LED1623G12|2700K|1000 lm|||89|smart bulb|-|Solux|[https://www.solux.net/cgi-bin/tlistore/colorviewbulbs.html ColorView]|3000K|310-1490 lm|100|100||120V only
|}
Osram has some 95+ TLCI products in its professional spot line. It's unclear whether the A bulbs from the same professional line are just as good or not. Osram only claims 80+ CRI even for the good stuff, and the A products are rated the same. They might be much better than specified.
=== High power class ===
!CRI
!R9
!TCLITLCI
!Notes
|-
|
|}
== References ==
* [https://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=131594.0| Luminous Landscape Forum | Has anyone looked into the modern LED video lights as a print evaluation light?]
